Tuesday, July 15, 2008

DOW Below 11K -- two days early on my call

For those of you who follow this Blog regularly, you know I made a call in June for the DOW to eventually break below 11,700 downside support: DOW -- Trouble Ahead?...

And then once broken, I made a call last week that the DOW would actually fall/close below the psychological 11K mark. DOW: Below 11K this week...

Well, the DOW actually DID dip below 11K (3 times) on Friday, but with Plunge Protection team assistance late in the day, it ended up closing above my < 11K projection for the week DOW Daily and Hot off the press news.

Anyway, looks like my target was finally hit today -- I was two trading days early with my call.

With that said, and with our toxic banking system contagion spreading like wildfire, I believe that if things don't improve quickly, 10,680 (the next significant downside support level) may also be taken out relatively soon.

From there, looks like 10,300 is the next downside support, followed by ~ 9,700.

Damn! This is getting downright scary -- even for me! Things are happening way too fast... This is big folks!!!



All the best

Randy

Market data and Jim Rogers interview

Asian Markets tanked overnight MAJOR WORLD INDICES

Hang Seng down > 3.8%
BSE 30 down nearly 5%
Seoul down >3%
Taiwan down almost 5%

Meanwhile, US Futures are looking dismal North/Latin America:

DOW down 139 points (Below 10,900 at open)
S&P down 16 (Below 1,212 at open)

The US Dollar is falling off a cliff

US Dollar index currently at 71.37 -- OUCH!

NOTE: ALL TIME LOW FOR INTRADAY TRADE IS 70.96

Gold and silver however are looking real good Live Market Quotes:

Gold up $11 overnight ( $984 oz) headed for $1,200 this year
Silver up $.30 ( nearing 19.50 oz) headed for $28 this year


As an aside:
I saw a video of Jim Rogers on Bloomberg yesterday that I was dying to share with all of you, but it looks like Bloomberg has pulled it already. I did however find the transcript: Rogers Calls Fannie, Freddie Rescue 'Disaster'

Jim was interviewed w/regard to his view on our government's efforts to bolster Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the outlook for financial stocks, the dollar and commodities, and his investment strategy. Warning: He held no punches!

CAROL MASSAR, BLOOMBERG NEWS: Our next guest is the man who correctly predicted oil would reach $100 and gold $1,000. Here to join us with his outlook on energy, commodities, the dollar, the credit crisis, everything under the sun, including Fannie and Freddie, Jim Rogers, Chairman of Rogers Holdings. He comes to us from Singapore this morning.

Jim, good morning. So, what do you think about what the government is doing or proposing to do with Fannie and Freddie?

JIM ROGERS, CHAIRMAN OF ROGERS HOLDINGS: It's an unmitigated disaster. I don't know where these guys get the audacity to take our money, taxpayer money, and buy stock in Fannie Mae. I mean, what is this?

If that is what they are doing with our tax money, why don't they ask us? I didn't say, take my money, my tax money, and buy Fannie Mae. Give it back to us if that's what they are going to do with it.

And what are they doing guaranteeing their debt? The people who bought debt in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can read a prospectus. They can read it. It says it is not guaranteed by the government. Anybody who can read a balance sheet knew that both of those companies were a sham and they had problems.

Now, we have to bail out the Japanese? The Japanese owe hundreds of millions of dollars of this stuff and so we are going to bail out the Japanese and the Chinese and everybody else in the world? What is this?

And it ruins the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, and it makes the dollar more vulnerable, and it increases inflation, and it drives down the dollar. Other than that, good morning.

MASSAR: Good morning. All right, so where do you think - all right. You have been very critical of the Fed and certainly some of the government moves here, Jim. So where do you think this is all leading us to?

ROGERS: It is leading to more and more rampant inflation. It is leading to a decline and the eventual demise of the United States dollar. And the FDIC this weekend used 10 percent of its assets to bail out a bank.

Anybody who has got money at Bank of America better make sure they don't have over $100,000, because 10 percent of the FDIC's assets just went there this morning.

MASSAR: Jim, a viewer e-mailed me last night, actually e-mailed Bloomberg, happens to be a mortgage banker and his question was for you. He is wondering if you covered your shorts Friday, especially in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

ROGERS: No, I have not covered my shorts. Obviously I should have, because you know they already are up 50 percent or something since then. If they go up a whole lot more, I will short more. They are basically insolvent. There is no question about that.

The government itself last week said the extra, the pool last week said that they are insolvent. Anybody who can read a balance sheet knows they are insolvent. So if they go up a lot, I will short more. If they go down, I will probably cover.

ELLEN BREITMAN, BLOOMBERG NEWS: Jim, it is Ellen Breitman here. I am looking at the Treasuries, which were little changed this morning. Now you have got the 10-year down 9/32s. Why are we not seeing more of a move in the Treasury market this morning? What should the investor reaction be on that front?

ROGERS: Well, I am short U.S. government bonds and I am short the long Treasuries, so for full disclosure, I think that most people are just sitting here confused and probably relieved at the moment and trying to figure out how this is going to work out.

But let me tell you how it is going to work out. It is going to mean the debt of the United States is going to be downgraded over the next few years. It means that U.S. government bonds are now going to become suspect down the line.

MASSAR: I want to go back to financials. So you mentioned Fannie and Freddie. Are you shorting most of the big names, be it Citigroup, Merrill Lynch? I mean, a lot of them are going to be reporting earnings this week or starting to, Jim. Do you not like any of the names here?

ROGERS: Carol, since I have been coming on your program, I have been short all the investment banks. I have been short Citibank, I have been short Fannie Mae, I am still short every one of them. I will cover them all some day, but some day is a long way from now.
If they rally, I will short some more. But no, why would anybody cover any of these stocks? They are all essentially in terrible, terrible financial shape.

MASSAR: You don't think we are getting to the end of this mess?

ROGERS: Well, Mr. Paulson said we have been coming to the end of it every month for the last year. I don't happen to agree with him.

MASSAR: What is your -

ROGERS: And Mr. Bernanke has also said we are coming to the end of it. Mr. Bernanke under oath told us before Congress that the housing crisis, that there was no problem in housing two years ago and three years ago. Mr. Bernanke under oath has been telling us for a while that everything is okay.


MASSAR: Jim, did we - I want to go back to Fannie and Freddie, if I may. I know I am jumping around here because there is a lot going on. I mean, did we have a choice though with Fannie and Freddie? I mean, they are responsible for what happened, the mortgages that are out there. I mean, could we have let them fail?

ROGERS: Carol, I know you always like to print money, you always like to bail out everybody in sight. But that is not the way capitalism is supposed to work. That is socialism for the rich. That is what that is. Welfare for the rich. Of course not.

Now, if we don't let Fannie Mae go broke and we are not, obviously, what is going to happen when you Band-Aid and put some Band-Aids on it for another year or two or three? What is going to happen three years from now when the situation is much, much, much worse? Then somewhere along the line, the market is going to hit us and we are not going to be able to do anything if we keep bailing out everybody in sight.

The Federal Reserve has already extended its balance sheet so desperately that they have trouble.

MASSAR: So very critical, Jim, of what the government is proposing to do with Fannie and Freddie. But yet, investors seem to like it and you have got the dollar moving up, so there seems to be a lot of support out there.

ROGERS: Well, of course investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac like it. The companies were going to go bankrupt if they hadn't stepped in to do something and they should have gone bankrupt, all the mistakes they made.

I would like to know why the people at Fannie Mae aren't in jail right now, the people at Freddie Mac aren't in jail.

MASSAR: But why is - Jim, why is the -

ROGERS: You know, a lot of people have gone to jail for fraud and scams.

MASSAR: Jim, why is the dollar up, though, this morning?

ROGERS: Well, I suspect it is because there is so many shorts. Everybody is negative on the dollar, including me, and whenever you have everybody on the same side of a trade, something comes along and you have a big rally. The shorts are covered. It is the way markets have worked for a few hundred years.

MASSAR: Are you still negative on the dollar at this point?

ROGERS: I just said everybody in the world is negative on the dollar, including me. So it is bound to rally, it could rally for another few weeks, few months. How do I know? I hope that if it does rally more this year that I will use that rally to get out of the rest of my U.S. dollars. The dollar is a terribly flawed currency, Carol.

MASSAR: Yes. And that is based on what - what about your expectations for interest rates around the world? I mean, there has been a bit of a debate now about what the Fed may do, but you have certainly seen governments around the globe raising rates to combat inflation. What is your outlook there?

ROGERS: Well, you are going to see higher rates. I am short United States government bonds, long bonds, because rates are going to go higher. The U.S. government says there is no inflation, but the rest - everybody else in the world knows there is inflation.

Most governments don't lie about it any more. They know they cannot lie about them. Inflation - the U.K. just a few minutes ago said they have the highest rate of inflation since 1986. Everybody does, and the U.K. is one of the governments that usually lies about it. So if they are saying it is that bad, you know it is really bad.

MASSAR: So, Jim, how do you think this is all going to be playing out? I mean, you are over there in Singapore, you are watching this. I mean, what is your expectations, first of all, for the U.S. and the economy here in the next, what, six to 12 months - and the markets, if you will?

ROGERS: Well, the United States is in a recession. It is going to be the worst recession we have had in a long time, perhaps since the Second World War, because the federal government keeps making mistakes. The central bank makes mistakes, the Treasury makes mistakes. Everybody keeps making mistakes.

It is going to be one of the worst. It is like Arthur Burns in the 1970s, he kept making mistakes and he had a horrible time. It's like the Bank of Japan in the 1990s, they kept making mistakes and in Japan, they still call up the '90s the ?Lost Decade.?


BREITMAN: Jim, it is Ellen Breitman again. I want to ask you a question I asked an earlier guest today, which is, when you look back over your entire career, how do this play out in terms of the level of history that is being made, Friday, Sunday, and today?

ROGERS: Well, it's a very good question and the answer, I don't think I want to give you the answer because you will probably cut me off the air. What is happening here is they are ruining the value of the U.S. dollar. They are ruining the Federal Reserve. They are ruining what has been one of the greatest economies in the world, bailing out everybody in sight.

This is a disaster for America. This is a disaster for the world. Ben Bernanke and Paulson are bailing out their friends on Wall Street, but there are 300 million of us Americans who are going to have to pay for this and there are six billion people in the world who are going to have to pay for this. And they are doing it with no authorization from anybody.

Paul Volcker said a couple of weeks ago that perhaps what the Federal Reserve has done is illegal. I would submit it is illegal what they have done and what they are doing. They are saddling all of us with hundreds of billions of dollars of debt that they have no authorization to do
.

MASSAR: So, Jim, if this had been another industry, take your pick, I mean, look at the woes that we have seen in the housing industry, you don't think the government would have jumped in so quickly to help out?

ROGERS: Well, I have no idea. They jumped in once before and helped out Pfizer 25 years ago, 30 years ago. Who knows? Conceivably, it depends on how many votes they think they can get. If they can buy some votes and right now, they are trying to make all their friends on Wall Street happy. But that is not good for anybody else but Wall Street.

Ben Bernanke picks up the phone every time Wall Street calls. Paulson picks up the phone every time Wall Street calls. You don't see any firemen out there in Nebraska calling him up. You don't see anybody out there with a real job. You don't see any schoolteachers in Oregon calling him up. If they did, they wouldn't take the call.

But all the schoolteachers in Oregon know that prices are going through the roof. It is very difficult for them to stay alive these days and hold body and soul together. They don't care. They take the calls from Bear Stearns. They take the call from Lehman Brothers.

MASSAR: Jim, you know, you sound so negative here. I mean, in terms of the U.S., anything you like within the U.S. market?

ROGERS: Sure. There are plenty of things that you can like in the United States market. I own - I have been buying airline stocks recently. I haven't bought any in the U.S. at the moment, but I have been buying airlines around the world. I have been buying agriculture.

I mean, America is the largest producer of agricultural goods in the world. I love agriculture, I love farmers. I wish everybody else did too.

MASSAR: Speaking of farmers, we know you love commodities. What about this commodity boom? I think recently we talked to you and or I was reading something and it said that we are in the fourth inning of a baseball game. Still there, in your view?

ROGERS: Probably around the fourth inning, that sounds good enough. Maybe the fourth and a half, maybe the top or the bottom of the fifth, something like that. The commodities bull market has a long way to go.

There are going to be corrections along the way, Carol, there always are, but no, nobody has discovered any major oil field in over 40 years. There just aren't any supplies of anything.
MASSAR: Jim, what do you make though of the arguments out there about demand destruction, about a weakening global economy and that is going to start to bring down commodities. I know you talk about some near-term corrections.

So, anything out there though that will substantially drag down commodities, in your view?

ROGERS: Well, recession, if the world goes into recession, of course it is going to drag down the demand. But remember, Carol, in the 1970s we had one of the worst decades in a long time for the economy. And oil went up ten times, the oil commodity, we had one of the great bull markets of all time in commodities because supply went down faster than demand and that is what is happening now too.

Oil can go down - you know the bull market in oil started in 1999. Three times since 1999, oil has gone down over 40 percent. It wasn't the end of the bull market. It just scared the socks off everybody, including me. That can happen again, but it is not the end of the bull market.

MASSAR: So, any pullbacks for a buying opportunity, in your view, whether it is oil, whether it is grains, whether it is base metals?

ROGERS: Yes, of course. Everything. Base metals have already corrected a lot. Wheat has corrected a lot. Sugar has corrected a lot. Get yourself some sugar, take it home, take it home from your Bloomberg.

MASSAR: Let's get back to our guest, Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings. So, Jim, got a favorite commodity at this point?

ROGERS: No, nothing really pops into my mind. Agriculture still, some of the base metals I am looking at. Some of the base metals, Dr. Nickel and Dr. Zinc saw the recession coming long before Dr. Bernanke did and they realized that there was problems. They are down 60 percent or something.

So, I am contemplating, only contemplating and only noticing that they are down. Some of these things are down a good amount.

MASSAR: What are you waiting for to buy in?

ROGERS: I don't know, some kind of signal that they have made a bottom. Some kind of panic selling, for instance. And also watching Taiwan and China on the same basis, if we could have panic selling in an old-fashioned selling climax in Taiwan or China, I would buy both of them as well.

MASSAR: You know, the CSI 300 is down 45 percent this year, the second worst performing major benchmark tracked by Bloomberg. Why are we seeing such a pullback?

ROGERS: Well, the market went up a huge amount in the previous two years and the Chinese government acknowledges that there is terrible inflation in China. They are doing their best to cut it back. They have raised interest rates seven times in the last year. They have raised reserve requirements 15 times.

The United States central bank has cut interest rates seven times. They have thrown gasoline onto a raging inflationary fire.

MASSAR: Are you selling any of your Chinese holdings?

ROGERS: No, never sold any Chinese shares. Own them all. I hope that my daughters own them some day. I think China has got a fabulous future. Selling China in 2008 would be like selling America in 1908, just as we were on the verge of becoming a fantastic, great success story.

MASSAR: So, Jim, I am guessing, and tell me if I am wrong, though, as a pullback in Chinese shares, do you see that as a buying opportunity?

ROGERS: Well, if they have a selling climax, yes. And probably the best opportunity will be Taiwan, because for the first time in my life, there is going to be peace in Taiwan. And so that whole economy, that whole nation is now going to have a dramatic change and it will be great for the world, but certainly for Taiwan.

BREITMAN: Jim, it is Ellen again. I am curious in terms of commodities, just switching back there. So much government intervention when it comes to the financials, do you think we could see any kind of government intervention when it comes to commodities or trying to talk down some of these prices?

ROGERS: Of course we can. Do you remember 1929? They passed the Smoot-Hawley Act, which led to the Great Depression, even though 1,000 economists went on record as saying you are making a terrible mistake. Politicians did it anyway.

Remember the weapons of mass destruction? We invaded Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction. Of course, politicians can do all kinds of simple, stupid things.

The IPO market has been driven out of America now because American politicians passed some absurd laws. They will probably do something. It will drive the commodities trade outside the U.S.


You know, the United States has dominated the commodities business for over 100 years. If the Congress of the United States is about to give the world on a silver platter and say; ?Here, take what you want. We are going to give you the commodities-trading business, it is going to leave America.?

At the same time, the politicians are saying pension funds can't invest in commodities. University endowments cannot invest in commodities. At a time where there is terrible inflation, they are going to say to the pension plans, you cannot protect yourselves from inflation, too bad. And I'd do that.

MASSAR: Jim, just 30-

ROGERS: It is insane, but they will do it.

MASSAR: 30 seconds left here. I know you mentioned you are kind of looking, eyeing at base metals. Anything else you think investors should be looking at, just kind of keeping on their radar, just quickly if you could?

ROGERS: Agriculture, agriculture. You should be buying agriculture. I am buying agriculture.

MASSAR: All right. We are going to leave it on that note. Jim, as always, good to get some time with you. Have a great day. Jim Rogers of Rogers Holdings.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Washington Mutual and National City Lead to Steepest EVER Bank Stock Decline

Investors, Depositors and FDIC are worried -- this is HUGE folks!

Steepest-Ever Decline in Bank Stock Index (Update2)




July 14 (Bloomberg) -- Washington Mutual Inc., the biggest U.S. savings and loan, and National City Corp., Ohio's largest bank, led the steepest-ever decline in the two-decade history of an index of bank stocks after IndyMac Bancorp Inc.'s collapse spurred concern more lenders are vulnerable to bad home loans.

IndyMac's failure has people worried about others.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Banks Index had its worst one-day decline since its was created in 1989, falling as much as 10 percent to close at 136.01.

``Take a very low profile,'' Laszlo Birinyi, who oversees more than $350 million in Westport, Connecticut, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. ``There's an awful lot of fires that need to be put out. I'm concerned about how we get them all out.''

Investors are speculating about which banks may fail after the demise of Pasadena, California-based IndyMac, which once ranked as the second-biggest U.S. mortgage company.

The collapse of IndyMac and deterioration in the construction, mortgage and auto lending markets indicate that losses at U.S. regional banks will force dividend cuts and additional capital raising, said analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and CreditSights Inc.

``After IndyMac, everyone asks, 'Who's next?' but I can list several names that strike me as far more likely to fail than National City,'' said Sterne Agee & Leach Inc. analyst Sean Ryan in an e-mail. National City has ``tons of capital and a real deposit base.'


Goldman put Zions, Utah's biggest bank, on its ``conviction sell'' list. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. predicted $26 billion in cumulative losses for Seattle-based Washington Mutual, and M&T Bank Corp., based in Buffalo, New York, posted a 25 percent decline in second-quarter profit.

Banks may report record unrealized securities losses of $35 billion in the second quarter, up 64 percent from the previous three months, the Goldman analysts said in a report today. Zions, SunTrust Banks Inc., Regions, Comerica Inc. and Bank of America Corp. are among companies that Goldman and CreditSights said may cut their dividends to help restore depleted capital.

IndyMac was seized after a run by depositors left the California mortgage lender short on cash last week. The government stepped in to help beleaguered home lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac yesterday when Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson asked Congress for authority to buy unlimited stakes and lend to the companies to halt a collapse in confidence.

The decision to protect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was needed to ``stem the growing risk of credit contraction in the U.S.,'' the Goldman analysts said.


So, IndyMac was the first domino to fall and is now operating under Gvt Conservatorship. I'm curious how that went today -- first day operating in this mode.

Customers swamp IndyMac to withdraw money

PASADENA, Calif.—Worried customers with deposits in excess of insured limits flooded IndyMac Bank branches on Monday, demanding to withdraw as much money as they could or get answers about the fate of their funds.
With the failed bank now under federal control, hundreds of people lined up before dawn outside its headquarters branch in Pasadena.

The crowd swelled throughout the day, with customers seeking shelter from the hot sun under makeshift tents. Many waited for hours to get inside what became IndyMac Federal Bank after its takeover Friday by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

"I didn't think this could happen," said Charles Tengeri, a retired school teacher who emerged from the bank with a check for $171,000—an amount he said represented most of his savings.

"I'm glad to get anything out," he said.

After waiting more than seven hours in line, Amy Miller walked out of the bank offices with a check for the funds she had invested in a one-year certificate of deposit. The crowd of fellow IndyMac customers burst into applause.

"Finally," the 35-year-old travel agency owner said, then took a bow. "I just couldn't wait for my money anymore."

Customers had been limited over the weekend to taking out funds through automated teller machines, debit card transactions and checks.

Customer Harvey Soldan spent Sunday night at a hotel near the bank so he could be among the first in line. With more than $100,000

in deposits, he anxiously waited to speak with bank officials.
"It's a question of how much we can get and how soon," Soldan said while waiting in line.

FDIC spokesman David Barr, who was stationed outside IndyMac headquarters, said it could take several years before the agency fully addresses customer claims.

"We have to completely unwind the affairs" of the bank, Barr said. "We may sell a portion to another bank, sell real estate. There may be lawsuits. There are a lot of different aspects to this."

IndyMac is the largest regulated thrift to fail and the second-largest financial institution to close in U.S. history, according to its regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision.

The FDIC insures bank deposits of up to $100,000 per depositor and up to $250,000 for funds in retirement accounts such as an IRA.


Speaking of the FDIC, I wonder how are they handling this potentially, very contagious, consumer loss of confidence in our public banking system?

With lots of Reassuring Propaganda -- of course:



With that calming reassurance out of the way (don't you feel better now), let me now tell you a couple of things the FDIC doesn't really want you to know/understand.

The FDIC has a set Designated Reserve Ratio of 1.25% of estimated, insured deposits -- therefore they have ~ $53 Billion (in insurance funds) backing total FDIC insured deposits of ~ $4.5 Trillion.

Current estimates for IndyMac's failure is between $4-8 Billion.

For ease of math (I imagine this initial failure estimate is very low), lets pick $8 Billion.

Therefore, the FDIC has ~ 45 Billion (53-8=45) left.

Let's now hypothetically suggest WAMU, National City and a few other banks also tank within the next year or so and this crisis completely depletes FDIC insurance... What then?

Glad you asked... How about another government taxpayer Bailout! Why not -- the Gvt will have already taken over Fannie and Freddie by then, and what's a few more trillion shared among the broke citizens of an already insolvent country.

Bottom line to the FDIC "what if": Depositors will still get their $100,000 insured by the FDIC, but it will take some time -- money will first need to be printed (causing a massive wave of new inflation). So by the time depositors get their physical money, inflation will have eroded away its purchasing power... It may or may not buy you a roll of toilet paper, but look at the bright side: even if it doesn't, you can use the dollars for the same purpose.

Weimar here we come!

Closing Note: We currently have > $14 Trillion circulating the globe and, in the U.S., less than 3% of that is available in cold, hard, cash -- the rest are ones and zeros on computer hard drives... Really makes one stop and think...

Do you have enough cash on hand in the event YOUR Bank closes it's doors? What if it take 6-months to a year to get your hyperinflated FDIC insurance money? Are you prepared?

Randy

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Peter Schiff on Fox: Fannie and Freddie

Peter, once again, telling it like it is.

Click "play" twice to load







Weekend Funnies































Las Vegas: Gaming Revenue down > 16%

Going back to 1970, there has only been ONE OTHER time (since this recent economic downturn) where gambling revenues actually fell -- in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. During that timeframe (2001-2002) gaming revenue fell 1 percent.



So how does the downturn today compare to 9/11?

On the Las Vegas Strip, gaming revenues were down 16.4 percent in May 2008 and down 5.4 percent for the first five months of 2008.

Clark County as a whole was far worse, including a 29 percent drop in North Las Vegas and a 30 percent drop in the Boulder Strip, which includes some casinos in Henderson.

This issue is causing gaming tax collections to plunge -- down 22.8 percent YoY -- the worst drop in at least 10 years -- exacerbating State budget woes.

"This is an incredibly difficult time for the state of Nevada, and it appears that we may need to prepare for an additional shortfall to our general fund for the fiscal year that just began," Gibbons said in a statement.

BUDGET BREAKER: Gaming tax collections sink


What's really hard to comprehend is: After 9/11, we saw thousands of hotel/casino layoffs -- yet, even though this downturn is much worse, we've seen very few to date. I therefore expect to see massive casino layoffs between now and Christmas 08 -- it's only a matter of time, as these highly leveraged institutions are taking a beating in the equity markets and will soon need to cut costs and improve bottom-lines.

For those of you who haven't already done so, take a look at these posts for more LV Downturn info:

Las Vegas Downturn Gathering Momentum

Economic Troubles Affect the Vegas Strip

Regards

Randy

Saturday, July 12, 2008

The Financial Frankenstein is On The Loose

I don't usually like to cut and past entire articles, but this one was just too good:

From Elliott Wave International: The Financial Frankenstein is On The Loose


Everything you've heard and read about Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac this week (and for weeks to come) is rubbish. That is, unless you keep one thing in mind:

Fan/Fred is bankrupt. Yes, B-A-N-K-R-U-P-T.

While I'm at it, please remember this as well: The politicians and policy pooh-bahs who say Fan/Fred is "too big to fail" are actually acknowledging that The Monster has failed ALREADY. I could write a lot of words about how corrupt these two institutions have been over the past decade -- multi-billion dollar scandals that paid multi-million dollar bonuses to executives, via accounting abuses on a scale that required 1,500 consultants to sort out. The Monster sends swarms of lobbyists to protect itself in Washington and swarms of money to both parties via soft-money contributions. It has a multi-million dollar budget to pump up its "image," but will not hesitate to squelch unflattering research -- such as the Federal Reserve study which showed that Fan/Fred does "not appear to have substantially increased homeownership or homebuilding."

Years and years of corrupt behavior produced layer and layer of congressional and regulatory "oversight." Yet today, The Monster mocks its creator more loudly than ever.

It has become a financial Frankenstein. And should anyone be surprised? The Monster received its artificial life from the government. It grew to its extraordinary strength and size because the government endowed it with artificial advantages (the implicit promise of a bailout which allowed borrowing at lower rates and lending at higher ones). And its creator (the government) could and did boast of how it did the world a favor, because its Creation "stimulated mortgage lending" and "madehomeownership possible for more families."

The Monster's "favors" now look increasingly like a ravishing of the entire financial landscape. But unlike the monster in the Frankenstein movie, the government cannot kill the Fan/Fred monster: pardon the mixed metaphor, but the Fan/Fred monster is a parasite that cannot be killed without also risking the life of the host, namely the entire banking and financial system.

It's time to look after your own financial portfolio and future -- indeed, the amount of time left for investors to do so appears to be growing shorter. We can help -- Bob Prechter and the analysts here at Elliott Wave International saw the problems with Fan/Fred coming years ago. Click here to see what we see now.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Fears Grow over Fannie and Freddy

Fears Grow Over Mortgage Giants -- Stocks of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are hammered as the housing slump spreads. Future of these two giants being debated. Gvt takeover required?



DOW Daily and Hot off the press news!

Well, I was only 1/2 right ( DOW: Below 11K this week) and underestimated the power of the Plunge Protection Team (PPT).

The Dow started off the day by opening > 150 points lower than yesterday's close, then spent much of the day fumbling along ~ 200 points lower -- and it actually dipped below 11,000 on three separate occasions, only to be followed by a massive PPT-induced 200 point rally late in the day (look at 2:30-3pm on chart below); ultimately closing 100 points above my target predicted earlier in the week. Oh well, we still have next week. I still believe 9K by end of year.




Hot off the press: Looks like INDYMAC HAS TANKED!!!!

Regulators Seize Mortgage Lender

Banking regulators seized IndyMac Bancorp, one of the country’s largest mortgage lenders, on Friday evening.

The bank, a star in the subprime era, is the second largest ever to fail and the first major bank to shut its doors since the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.

The bank collapse came after a frenzied week as IndyMac’s executives tried — and failed — to bolster the bank’s financial footing. The bank, based in Pasadena, Calif., said on Monday that it had stopped making new loans and announced layoffs of more than half of its 7,200 workers. But IndyMac’s customers — afraid their savings might disappear — stampeded tellers, demanding their money back.

The run on the bank came after a critical letter about the bank’s future written by Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York. Federal regulators said on Friday that Mr. Schumer’s letter had pushed IndyMac into collapse, causing the bank run and scaring away potential acquirers.

“The senator made comments in his letter questioning the viability of the institution,” John M. Reich, director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, said on a phone call with reporters. “When a member of the United States Senate makes such a statement, it frightens depositors.”

In the days after Mr. Schumer’s letter was released on June 26, IndyMac customers withdrew an average of $100 million a day from the bank, or a total of $1.3 billion, the government said. Before Mr. Schumer’s letter, the bank had been receiving net inflows of money from depositors, Mr. Reich said.

Mr. Schumer, who has been critical of bank regulators for months, released a statement, in turn, criticizing Mr. Reich’s agency.

“If O.T.S. had done its job as regulator and not let IndyMac’s poor and loose lending practices continue, we wouldn’t be where we are today,” he said.

For all the write-downs and bad news on Wall Street over the last year, few regional and local bank have shut their doors. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation listed just 76 troubled banks in its report in April. The handful that have failed have been a fraction of the size of IndyMac. IndyMac held $30 billion in deposits as of late March, according to the government release.

“It’s the biggest failure in 24 years,” said Chip MacDonald, a banking lawyer at Jones Day in Atlanta. “You haven’t had a lot of failures of that size, yet.”

IndyMac’s collapse was unrelated to the market worries about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the big mortgage finance companies.

Next week should be quite interesting

Randy

Could this be the day?

On Monday this week, I stated the: DOW will fall below 11K this week. Thus far, it's been a rollercoaster ride and we've come close, but it hasn't yet happened -- but today could change things!


Consumer confidence, Mich Sentiment and import/export inflation all come out shortly and current DOW fututes look to be down 120 (Ouch!) -- merely 98 points from my threshold!


With that said, GOLD is looking swell -- see chart below.



Hold on to your hats folks!

Randy

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Fannie and Freddy -- walking dead

I've been hammering Fannie and Freddy since my very first post in 2005 and have always suspected that they were merely walking dead, but the Gvt. couldn't allow the public to know this, so they propped up their carcass of a body just like the characters did their boss in "Weekend at Bernie's"



Well, it now looks like the cat is out of the bag, as former St. Louis Federal Reserve President William Poole said Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are insolvent and that the government might need to step in to rescue the struggling lenders.

“Congress ought to recognize that these firms are insolvent, that it is allowing these firms to continue to exist as bastions of privilege, financed by the taxpayer,” Poole said Wednesday.

In other words, he believes they're virtually bankrupt!

Fannie, Freddie Tumble on Bailout Concern

July 10 (Bloomberg) -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two biggest providers of financing for U.S. home loans, fell to the lowest levels in 17 years in New York trading after a former Federal Reserve president said the companies may need a government rescue.

Fannie Mae tumbled as much as 24 percent and Freddie Mac slumped as much as 34 percent in New York Stock Exchange composite trading after UBS AG analysts said in a report today that Freddie Mac's decline creates ``challenges'' for the company's plan to raise $5.5 billion

Chances are increasing that the U.S. will bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because they don't have enough capital to weather the worst housing slump since the Great Depression, former St. Louis Federal Reserve President William Poole said in an interview. Freddie Mac owed $5.2 billion more than its assets were worth in the first quarter, making it insolvent under fair value accounting rules. The fair value of Fannie Mae assets fell 66 percent to $12.2 billion, data provided by the Washington- based company show, and may be negative next quarter, Poole said.

The companies, created to boost homeownership and promote market stability, own or guarantee about half the $12 trillion in U.S. home loans outstanding. In addition to those obligations, Fannie Mae has $831 billion in company bonds outstanding, while Freddie Mac has $644 billion, according to Bloomberg data.

Government Ties

Congress created Freddie Mac and expanded Fannie Mae in 1970 to promote home buying in the U.S. The companies' charters give the Treasury the authority to buy as much as $2.25 billion in each of their securities in the event of possible default.

The government will likely be forced to take over the companies because of the mortgage meltdown, Poole said.

``We know in a crisis the Federal Reserve tap would be open,'' said Poole, now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

The bailout of Bear Stearns Cos. by JPMorgan Chase & Co., arranged by the Fed, demonstrates the government's unwillingness to allow ``large, systemically important'' financial institutions to fail, he said. Bear Stearns collapsed after customers fled amid speculation the company faced a cash shortage.

``I worry about those institutions,'' retired Richmond Fed President Alfred Broaddus said. ``They are huge. They dwarf the Bear Stearns issue. In the very worst case scenario, I don't know how you do it other than extend money and the public takes the loss.''

Bottom line:

This is huge folks! If Fannie and Freddy were allowed to fail (won't be allowed), we would quickly fall into an ECONOMIC DEPRESSION (i.e. lack of new home loan credit = lack of new money circulating, destruction of debt/bond/equity markets, a complete lack of home sales/swiftly building inventories, MANY times more home loan defaults than expected and an ABSOLUTE COLLAPSE IN HOME PRICES -- compounding several times over the current banking/financial system crisis and significant economic pains that we are now experiencing).

If the GVT indeed does bail them out (likely) expect a HYPERINFLATIONARY Spiral -- followed by a depression anyway. We're talking TRILLIONS of new dollars quickly added to a bloated fiat system that is already creating new money at a near 20% annual rate -- adding explosive fuel to a raging forest fire and increasing the velocity of US Dollar decline and ultimately Dollar hegemony collapse.

Once again, the Plunge Protection Team and Gvt are stuck between a rock and a hard-place, and the days of easy fixes have long since past... We should have taken our harsh medicine after the Dot.com crash, but the Maestro (Greenspan) wanted to leave his chair on a high note. Though honored, knighted and revered around the globe, Alan Greenspan (when history is written/analyzed) will likely go down as one of the WORST Fed Chairman EVER! I hope he can sleep well at night, knowing what he hath wrought.

As an aside: for those who don't understand the word hegemony (used above), I highly suggest you read a superb Ron Paul article written back in 2006: The End of Dollar Hegemony

All the best

Randy





Congress: Unfinished Business as Usual

Our Nations finest in (in)action:

Although faced with pressing concerns such as the nation's mortgage crisis, high gas prices and the list goes on, Congress still managed to take an extended recess for Independence Day...

Congress said they felt our pain; they said they wouldn't be able to choke down their July 4th hot dogs unless they passed a bill to help with the mortgage crisis.

"It may knock a few people out of parades on July 4th or whatever," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid last week. "However long it takes us to do this."

They promised to stay, then promptly left with unfinished business.

It was just another blow to Americans hit by the mortgage crisis - tens of thousands of them spending the holiday barely hanging on to their homes.

Congress hasn't done any better on the energy crisis.

"We will lead our nation in a new direction toward energy independence that strengthens both our economic and national security," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over a year ago.

I would like to say this is unbelievable, but it's not -- more like par for the course.





We certainly deserve better. What's it going to take folks?

Randy

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Argentina's Economic Collapse

Possibly a glimpse into what our future may hold?

Argentina's Economic Collapse of 2001 - Part 1




Part 2



Part 3


Part 4


Part 5


Part 6


Part 7


Part 8


Part 9


Part 10



Part 11


Part 12